‘Community libraries’ could charge for membership and loans says County Councillor

Gloucestershire County Council cabinet member Stan Waddington (Conservative – Nailsworth and Minchinhampton) advocated yesterday at the Minchinhampton Library consultation meeting that community run libraries directly charge customers either for membership or for the loan of books. It is worth remembering that the ‘community library’ model is proposed by the Council for some of our county’s least affluent and most disadvantaged areas.

This is on the basis that these libraries will not be covered by the 1964 Public Libraries & Museums Act as they will not be part of Gloucestershire County Council library network. The Council has confirmed that it thinks this is legal. The Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (MLA) have described this as a ‘significant development’ and already said that they will look into this.

Thin end of the wedge?

Direct charging through the back door?

Quadruple whammy for community library users – pay in your council tax; pay in your parish council precept; pay in the library; AND you are expected to volunteer to run the library for FREE!

Fair and equitable? – Definitely not!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to ‘Community libraries’ could charge for membership and loans says County Councillor

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention ‘Community libraries’ could charge for membership and loans says County Councillor | Friends of Gloucestershire Libraries -- Topsy.com

  2. Nicola Franklin says:

    How can a council believe that abdicating their responsibility to provide a comprehensive library service (for ALL) their constituents, by handing half of them over to ‘volunteer’ (if they are charging, surely this should be ‘private sector’) organisations, is legal within the terms of the Act?

  3. Neil McCart says:

    By making a charge for the use of a Library or for the loan of books would make it an exclusive private readers club, rather than a public library run for and on behalf of the community. It makes a total nonsense of the claim that it would be run for the community as a whole.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s