Day three of court hearing – delayed judgement announced

Today was the third and final day in court, and the turn of James Goudie QC to present Gloucestershire and Somerset County Council’s defences.

Please note, we are not legal experts so this is a very brief, summarised, and incomplete account of today’s events.
GCC’s defence questioned the council’s obligation to consult, to take account of deprivation and equalities, and to inform communities and the wider populace about its plans. Mr Goudie argued that GCC had met and exceeded its obligations in this regard. He argued that the library network which will remain in place was adequate to comply with the 1964 Act, and as the proposed community libraries did not form part of this statutory provision it didn’t really matter if they failed. He questioned the relevance of the Act in the age of the internet, and argued that there was no issue with people no longer being able to get to a public library if their local one closed, as everyone should be able to get on a bus to another one. There were also lots of references to case law, as with Helen Mountfield QC’s submissions on behalf of the claimants on day one. 
It was decided that there will be a delayed judgement on the case. We don’t know exactly when the judgement will be made, but PIL have suggested it could be a month or two. We will of course keep you informed.

Thanks so much to the many people (from both within Gloucestershire and around the UK) who have sent emails and tweets of support over the last few days – it has meant a lot during this very tough week and reminds us why we have fought so hard and for so long to save our libraries!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Day three of court hearing – delayed judgement announced

  1. Fiona Kirton says:

    So the QC thinks we all have nice fancy cars like himself and is not aware of the massive cuts to bus services, or the transport problems of rural communities, (our village has no bus at all) which stop people from accessing libraries. Surprised he did not attack the Equalities Act whilst he was at it. No suprise he is representing SCC with those attitudes.
    Fiona KIrton

    • Hi Fiona,

      I think he probably did! As the claimant’s QC said, the defence made a parody of the claims. It was disappointing to hear him do this rather than address the issues with reason…but as you say…no wonder he represents SCC and GCC with those attitudes


  2. Well, whatever the result, we owe a tremendous debt to Johanna and Demelza et al for their tireless campaigning. I doubt if anybody could have done more. And if GCC and SCC win, shame on them for ever more.

  3. Fiona Kirton says:

    No we could not have done more. Lets hope the Judiciary are truly independent and uninfluenced political pressure.


  4. Pingback: Something more important than a court case happened today | The Daily Librarian

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s